Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 12;22(3):e17425. doi: 10.2196/17425

Table 2.

Self-reported results and session scores.

Variable High-fidelity simulation (n=25) Virtual reality (n=25) P value
How real was the experience, median (IQR) 62.0 (50.5-70.0) 50.0 (44.5-66.0) .13
How useful was the experience in teaching you how to run a code, median (IQR) 90.0 (83.0-99.5) 83.0 (80.0-90.5) .08
How useful was the feedback received, median (IQR) 99.0 (89.0-100.0) 79.0 (71.0-88.0) <.001
I enjoyed the experience (Yes), n (%) 23 (92) 22 (88) .63
I would like to use this as a way to recertify my ACLSa (Yes), n (%) 25 (100) 23 (92) .14
Was this experience as valuable as your live training for Mega Code the last time you had to recertify? (Yes), n (%) 25 (100) 22 (88) .25
I would do this once every 6 months to refresh my skills if it was NOT required but I was given time to do so (Yes), n (%) 25 (100) 24 (96) .72
Scored domainsb



Total correct percentage technical domains, median (IQR) 72.7 (60.0-78.2) 47.0 (40.0-58.0) <.001

Nontechnical domains, median (IQR)


Situational awareness 6.0 (5.0-7.0) 1.0 (1.0-1.0) <.001


Decision making 6.0 (4.0-6.0) 6.0 (4.0-6.0) .52


Communication 5.0 (4.0-6.0) 4.0 (1.0-6.0) .09

aACLS: advanced cardiac life support.

bFor scored domains, n=23 each for high-fidelity simulation and virtual reality.