Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;318(3):H566–H580. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00739.2018

Table 1.

TASK-1 global knockout TAC experiment hemodynamics

Wild Type
TASK-1 KO
Sham TAC Sham TAC
n 6 8–9 5 12
TAC gradient, mmHg NA 54 ± 6.8 NA 46 ± 6.0
Heart rate, beats/min 397 ± 35 362 ± 24 443 ± 19 415 ± 24
LVESP, mmHg 131 ± 18 164 ± 15 125 ± 11 171 ± 11
LVEDP, mmHg 7.3 ± 2.2 6.8 ± 0.8 5.4 ± 0.4 5.9 ± 0.7
LVESV, μL 15 ± 3.0 27 ± 4.5 18 ± 3.4 13 ± 3.2*
LVEDV, μL 31 ± 3.9 40 ± 3.6 37 ± 3.9 34 ± 2.8
Arterial elastance, mmHg/μL 8.6 ± 1.8 14.0 ± 2.5 6.6 ± 0.8 8.0 ± 0.93*
Systolic function parameters
    Stroke volume, μL 16 ± 1.9 13 ± 1.6 19 ± 1.9  20.0 ± 1.6*
    Ejection fraction, % 55 ± 7.9 36 ± 7.5 52 ± 6.1  65.0 ± 6.6*
    Cardiac output, μL/min 6,334 ± 894 4,588 ± 561 8,232 ± 722 8,331 ± 587*
    Stroke work, mmHg·μL 1,555 ± 306 1,427 ± 254 1,672 ± 214 2,621 ± 268*
    dP/dtmax, mmHg/s 10,142 ± 1,978 6,718 ± 735 9,359 ± 570 9,289 ± 592
    ESPVR linear, mmHg/μL 5.0 ± 0.8 6.1 ± 1.0  5.2 ± 1.4 5.9 ± 0.6
    ESPVR quadratic E′max, mmHg/μL 14.0 ± 4.6 12.0 ± 1.9 13.0 ± 2.0 16.0 ± 1.3
    PRSW, mmHg 52.0 ± 6.2 67.0 ± 8.5 54.0 ± 7.2 83.0 ± 6.3
    dP/dtmax vs. EDV, mmHg·s−1·μL−1 280 ± 120 201 ± 33 284 ± 85 225 ± 36
    Emax, mmHg/μL 11.0 ± 3.7 9.2 ± 1.5 11.0 ± 3.4 9.7 ± 0.8
Diastolic function parameters
    dP/dtmin, mmHg/s 8,101 ± 1,645 −6,137 ± 713 −7,547 ± 900 −8,479 ± 521
    τ (Weiss), ms 9.1 ± 1.0 11.0 ± 0.9 8.6 ± 0.6 7.3 ± 0.4*
    τ (Glantz), ms 15.0 ± 2.5 20.0 ± 2.5 13.0 ± 0.5 12.0 ± 0.5*
    τ (log), ms 7.4 ± 0.8 9.2 ± 0.9 6.8 ± 0.2 6.0 ± 0.3*
    dV/dtmin, μL/s −431 ± 45 −349 ± 46 −564 ± 49 −576 ± 64*
    EDPVR linear, mmHg/μL 0.30 ± 0.06 0.39 ± 0.10 0.23 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.04
    β-Coefficient 0.11 ± 0.04 0.13 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01

Values are means ± SE; n = no. of mice. Average load-dependent and load-independent hemodynamic parameters obtain invasive pressure-volume loop analyses in wild-type and tandem pore domain acid-sensitive K+ channel 1 (TASK-1) global knockout (KO) mice that underwent either a sham procedure (Sham) or pressure overload using transverse aortic constriction (TAC). dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin, maximum and minimum dP/dt, respectively; dV/dtmin, minimum dV/dt; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; EDV, end-diastolic volume; Emax, maximal elastance; E′max, maximum slope of quadratic end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR); LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESP, left ventricular end-systolic pressure; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; NA, not applicable; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; τ, time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation. Statistical comparisons between TAC gradients were made using a 2-tailed unpaired t-test, and all others were made using a 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparisons.

*

P < 0.05 vs. wild-type TAC.