Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;318(3):H566–H580. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00739.2018

Table 2.

TASK-3 global knockout TAC experiment hemodynamics

Wild Type
TASK-3 KO
Sham TAC Sham TAC
n 7 8 7 13–15
TAC gradient, mmHg NA NA 67 ± 12.0 77 ± 8.7
Heart rate, beats/min 503 ± 35 397 ± 15* 520 ± 36 402 ± 15*
LVESP, mmHg 105 ± 9 188 ± 14* 103 ± 13 172 ± 12*
LVEDP, mmHg 13.0 ± 2.8 5.3 ± 1.9 11.0 ± 1.3 13.0 ± 1.5
LVESV, μL 11.0 ± 2.8 26.0 ± 6.1 33.0 ± 5.3 35.0 ± 5.4
LVEDV, μL 36.0 ± 3.4 46.0 ± 7.2 54.0 ± 6.8 55.0 ± 5.3
Arterial elastance, mmHg/μL 3.9 ± 0.5 13.0 ± 4.0 5.2 ± 0.6 11.0 ± 1.9
Systolic function parameters
    Stroke volume, μL 25 ± 1.6 19 ± 3.1 21 ± 3.1 19 ± 2.2
    Ejection fraction, % 72 ± 5.2 46 ± 7.4* 40 ± 3.9* 39 ± 5.3
    Cardiac output, μL/min 2,928 ± 1,487 7399 ± 1,111* 10,440 ± 1,171 7,407 ± 670
    Stroke work, mmHg·μL 1,992 ± 122 2,550 ± 488 1,712 ± 438 2,133 ± 206
    dP/dtmax, mmHg/s 8,309 ± 859 9,032 ± 714 7,573 ± 1,079 7,771 ± 472
    ESPVR linear, mmHg/μL 4.2 ± 0.8 5.5 ± 1.2 5.3 ± 2.1 7.2 ± 1.8
    ESPVR quadratic E′max, mmHg/μL 11.0 ± 1.5 13.0 ± 2.4 15.0 ± 4.1 14.0 ± 3.5
    PRSW, mmHg 61.0 ± 5.5 59.0 ± 8.9 51.0 ± 6.9 54.0 ± 6.2
    dP/dtmax vs. EDV, mmHg·s−1·μL−1 177 ± 42 187 ± 45 194 ± 48 145 ± 20
    Emax, mmHg/μL 7.5 ± 0.9 8.9 ± 2.0 9.9 ± 2.6 10.0 ± 2.5
Diastolic function parameters
    dP/dtmin, mmHg/s −8,580 ± 475 −9,677 ± 737 −7,162 ± 915 −7,485 ± 525
    τ (Weiss), ms 6.4 ± 0.6 7.9 ± 0.5 8.0 ± 0.6 8.9 ± 0.4
    τ (Glantz), ms 11.0 ± 1.0 14.0 ± 1.1 14.0 ± 2.1 16.0 ± 1.2
    τ (log), ms 5.3 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 0.5 5.9 ± 0.7 7.3 ± 0.4
    dV/dtmin, μL/s −764 ± 59 −493 ± 72 −713 ± 86 −649 ± 78
    EDPVR linear, mmHg/μL 0.18 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.06* 0.38 ± 0.04 0.46 ± 0.06
    β-Coefficient 0.04 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.01

Values are means ± SE; n = no. of mice. Average load-dependent and load-independent hemodynamic parameters obtain invasive pressure-volume loop analyses in wild-type and tandem pore domain acid-sensitive K+ channel 3 (TASK-3) global knockout (KO) mice that underwent either a sham procedure (Sham) or pressure overload using transverse aortic constriction (TAC). dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin, maximum and minimum dP/dtmin, respectively; dV/dtmin, minimum dV/dt; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; EDV, end-diastolic volume; Emax, maximal elastance; E′max, maximum slope of quadratic end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; ESPVR, end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESP, left ventricular end-systolic pressure; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; τ, time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation. Statistical comparisons between TAC gradients were made using a 2-tailed unpaired t-test, and all others were made using a 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparisons.

*

P < 0.05 vs. wild-type TAC.