Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;318(3):C675–C694. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00492.2019

Table 4.

Transepithelial and principal cell basolateral and apical membrane voltages and Cl diffusion potential

Genotype Transepithelial Voltage, mV Principal Cell Basolateral Membrane Voltage, mV Principal Cell Apical Membrane Voltage, mV Transepithelial Cl Diffusion Potential, mV
mesh Knockdown in adult principal cells, −DK
    GAL4 control 8.9 ± 4.2 (9) −47.8 ± 8.2 (6) 54.7 ± 7.0 (4) 8.8 ± 7.8 (10)
    mesh Knockdown 5.2 ± 3.6 (20) −49.9 ± 4.3 (9) 55.1 ± 5.3 (8) 7.9 ± 8.0 (15)
mesh Knockdown in adult principal cells, +DK
    GAL4 control 3.2 ± 3.5 (9) −49.3 ± 5.5 (6) 50.8 ± 5.9 (4) 17.0 ± 9.3 (10)
    mesh Knockdown 1.6 ± 3.4 (20) −47.5 ± 1.8 (9) 49.3 ± 5.8 (8) 11.8 ± 10.4 (15)
Two-way ANOVA P values
    Genotype 0.0204 0.7372 0.8915 0.3747
    Drosokinin <0.0001 0.5260 0.0635 0.0005
    Interaction 0.2686 0.1613
Sidak’s multiple comparison adjusted P values
    −DK
        GAL4 control vs. mesh knockdown 0.0231 0.9655
    +DK
        GAL4 control vs. mesh knockdown 0.4402 0.2998

Values are means ± SD; number of tubules n is in parentheses. See Table 3 legend for genotypes. The meshRNAi line used is 12074-R1. Paired electrophysiological measurements (with and without 1 µM drosokinin) were made of control and adult principal cell mesh knockdown tubules. The apical membrane voltage was calculated as transepithelial voltage minus basolateral membrane voltage in tubules in which both values were measured. P values for repeated measures 2-way ANOVA are shown. DK, drosokinin.