Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 20;2:19. doi: 10.1186/s42492-019-0025-6

Table 1.

Summary of literature for magnetic resonance imaging radiomics feature robustness

Reference Disease / phantom MR sequences # features Feature classes Parameters evaluated Statistical analysis Robustness evaluation
Baessler et al. [26], 2019 Vegetable/fruit phantom FLAIR, T1w, T2w 45 Intensity, shape, texture MR sequence, resolution CCC, DR, Bland-Altman analyses, ICC Test-retest robustness, intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility
Traverso et al. [50], 2019 Locally advanced rectal cancer DWI (ADC map) 70 Intensity, shape, texture Pre-processing filter, re-binning and resampling CCC, ICC, Spearman correlation Inter-observer dependence
Duron et al. [39], 2019 Lacrymal gland tumor and breast lesion T1w, DWI (ADC map), DIXON, DISCO 69/57 (2 softwares) Texture Discretization method, bin width and bin number CCC, ICC(2,1) Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility
Lecler et al. [37], 2019 Lacrimal gland tumor T1w, DWI (ADC map), DIXON 85 Intensity, shape, texture MR sequence, metric threshold CCC, ICC(2,1), Spearman correlation Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, non-redundancy
Um et al. [51], 2019 Glioblastoma multiforme FLAIR, T1w, post-contrast T1w 420 Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based Preprocessing technique on multi-scanner datasets, bin number Two-sided Wilcoxon tests Feature variability
Schwier et al. [24], 2019 Prostate cancer T2w, DWI (ADC map) NA Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based Image normalization, 2D/3D texture computation, bin widths, and image pre-filtering ICC(1,1) Test-retest repeatability
Fiset et al. [38], 2019 Cervical cancer T2w 1761 Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based Quantization method, LoG kernel sizes, ICC(1,1), ICC(2,1), Pearson correlation, Krippendorff’s alpha Test-retest repeatability, cross-scanner reproducibility, inter-observer reproducibility
Peerlings et al. [33], 2019 Ovarian, lung and colorectal liver metastasis cancer DWI (ADC map) 1322 Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based Center and vendor CCC Feature stability
Buch et al. [52], 2018 Nonanatomic Gd-DTPA phantom T1w 41 Intensity, texture, filter-based (Laws) Magnet strength, flip-angle, number of excitations, scanner platform Q values Feature variability
Yang et al. [53], 2018 Simulated data from digital phantom and glioma T1w, T2w 26 Texture Noise level, acceleration factor, and image reconstruction algorithm Student’s t-test, CV Feature variance
Bologna et al. [32], 2018 Soft tissue sarcoma and oropharyngeal cancer DWI (ADC map) 69 Intensity, texture ROI transformation and bin number Absolute percentage variation, two-way mixed effect ICC Feature stability and discrimination
Chirra et al. [40], 2018 Prostate cancer T2w 406 Intensity, texture, filter-based Different sites Multivariate CV and Instability Score Cross-site reproducibility
Saha et al. [31], 2018 Breast cancer DCE-MRI (first postcontrast, PE, SER, washing rate maps) 529 Intensity, shape, texture Scanner, contrast agent ICC(3,1), Pearson correlation, average DSC Inter-reader stability, inter-relations within feature groups, pairwise reader variability
Molina et al. [27], 2017 Glioblastoma T1w 16 Texture Spatial resolution and bin number CV Feature variation
Brynolfsson et al. [54], 2017 Glioma and prostate cancer DWI (ADC map) 19 Texture noise level, resolution, ADC map construction, quantization method, and bin number Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests Feature distribution variation
Gourtsoyianni et al. [41], 2017 Primary rectal cancer T2w 46 Intensity, texture, filter-based 2 baseline examinations wCV Test-retest repeatability
Guan et al. [55], 2016 Cervical cancer DWI (ADC map) 8 Intensity, texture GLCM direction ICC, Wilcoxon test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and ROC curve Inter- and intra-observer agreement
Molina et al. [56], 2016 Glioblastoma T1w 16 Texture Matrix size and bin number CV Feature variation
Savio et al. [57], 2010 Multiple sclerosis T1w 264 Intensity, texture, filter-based Global, regional and local features Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test Feature variation
Mayerhoefer et al. [58], 2009 PSAG phantom T2w NA Texture, filter-based Spatial resolution, NAs, TR, TE, and SBW LDA and k-NN classifier Ability to distinguish between different patterns
Collewet et al. [59], 2004 Cheese phantom T2w, PDW 90 Texture, filter-based MRI acquisition protocol and quantization method POE, ACC, 1-NN classifier Classification

MR Magnetic resonance, FLAIR Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI Diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC Apparent diffusion coefficient, DISCO Differential subsampling with cartesian ordering, DCE-MRI Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, PE Peak enhancement, SER Signal enhancement ratio, PDW Proton density weighted, LoG Laplacian of Gaussian, NAs Number of acquisitions, TR Repetition time, TE Echo time, SBW Sampling bandwidth, CCC Concordance correlation coefficient, DR Dynamic range, ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient, wCV Within-subject coefficient of variation, ROC Receiver operating characteristic, CV Coefficient of variation, DSC Dice similarity coefficients, LDA Linear discriminant analysis, k-NN k nearest neighbor, POE Probability of error, ACC Average correlation coefficient, 1-NN 1-nearest neighbor