Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;11:214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00214

Table 5.

Temporal within-person associations between affective states, self-efficacy to resist NSSI, and non-suicidal self-injury.

Analyses controlling
NSSI behavior t – 1 ha
Analyses controlling
NSSI thoughts t – 1 hb
B (SD) 95% CI B (SD) 95% CI
Temporal within-person associations
 NSSI behavior t – 1 h 0.31 (0.10) 0.07; 0.49 0.04 (0.14) −0.23; 0.28
 NSSI thoughts t – 1 h 0.32 (0.07) 0.20; 0.45 0.32 (0.05) 0.21; 0.43
 Negative affect t – 1 h 0.26 (0.08) 0.12; 0.41 0.14 (0.10) −0.06; 0.33
 Positive affect t – 1 h 0.19 (0.06) 0.32; −0.09 −0.12 (0.07) −0.26; 0.03
 Self-efficacy to resist NSSI t – 1 h 0.43 (0.08) 0.58; −0.29 0.33 (0.08) 0.49; −0.19
a

Analyses are based on separate multilevel regression analyses for each risk and protective factor, with the factor in the row the predictor and controlling the autoregressive parameter of NSSI behavior.

b

Analyses are based on multilevel regression analyses for each risk and protective factor, with the variable in the row as predictor and controlling the cross-regressive parameter of NSSI thoughts (cf. Figure 2).

B, median unstandardized point estimate; SD, posterior standard deviation; CI, credibility interval.

Bolded cells indicate that there is a 95% probability that the true population value is not null.