Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;20:253. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06761-0

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients in subgroups of accurate-T-staging, over-T-staging and under-T-staging

Characteristics Total Accurate-T-staging Over-T-staging Under-T-staging P Value
Cases 551 392 (69.6%) 109 (19.4%) 50 (8.9%)
Gender 0.633
 Female 233 (42.3%) 169 (43.1%) 46 (42.2%) 18 (36%)
 Male 318 (57.7%) 223 (56.9%) 63 (57.8%) 32 (64%)
Age 59.7 ± 13.4 60.2 ± 12.9 57.3 ± 14.4 61.3 ± 14.4 0.102
BMI 22.5 ± 4.19 22.5 ± 4.4 22.5 ± 3.8 22.5 ± 3.4 0.998
Diabetes Mellitus 0.157
 No 507 (93.9%) 360 (93%) 99 (94.3%) 48 (100%)
 Yes 33 (6.1%) 27 (7%) 6 (5.7%) 0 (0%)
CEA 2.73 (0–255) 2.7 (0–255) 2.7 (0–197) 4.5 (1–81) 0.62
CA199 10.2 (0–2188) 10.64 (0–2188) 7.59 (0–1156) 10.35 (0–117) 0.001
Bowel Obstruction 0.008
 No 471 (87.5%) 350 (89.7%) 88 (79.3%) 44 (89.8%)
 Yes 67 (12.5%) 40 (10.3%) 23 (20.7%) 5 (10.2%)
WBC 6.53 ± 1.93 6.54 ± 1.91 6.53 ± 2.11 6.48 ± 1.71 0.984
HB 124.3 ± 21.5 125.0 ± 19.5 123.4 ± 24.4 121.1 ± 28.7 0.433
PLT 234.5 ± 78.4 237.6 ± 80.1 227.2 ± 74.5 226.4 ± 72.7 0.355
ALB 41.5 ± 6.30 41.6 ± 6.10 40.8 ± 6.96 42.2 ± 6.37 0.381
Tumor Location 0.186
 Upper 217 (39.4%) 163 (41.6%) 37 (33.9%) 17 (34%)
 Middle 141 (25.6%) 101 (25.8%) 24 (22%) 16 (32%)
 Low 193 (35%) 128 (32.7%) 48 (44%) 17 (34%)
Tumor Size (cm) 4.07 ± 1.69 4.22 ± 1.70 3.76 ± 1.70 3.60 ± 1.37 0.005*
Histological Subtype 1
 Classic Adenocarcinoma 505 (92%) 359 (92.1%) 100 (91.7%) 46 (92%)
 Mucinous Adenocarcinoma 44 (8%) 31 (7.9%) 9 (8.3%) 4 (8%)
Differentiation 0.824
 Grade 1/2 471 (92.4%) 337 (92.1%) 91 (94.8%) 43 (89.6%)
 Grade 3/4 39 (7.6%) 29 (7.9%) 5 (5.2%) 5 (10.4%)
MMR Status 0.823
 pMMR 350 (94.1%) 17 (6.6%) 4 (4.8%) 1 (3.1%)
 dMMR 22 (5.9%) 239 (93.4%) 80 (95.2%) 31 (96.9%)
Ras Mutation 0.322
 No 496 (90%) 355 (90.6%) 99 (90.8%) 42 (84%)
 Yes 55 (10%) 37 (9.4%) 10 (9.2%) 8 (16%)

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, WBC white blood cell, HB hemoglobin, PLT plate, ALB albumin, pMMR mismatch repair-proficient, dMMR mismatch repair-deficient

*Post Hoc Test: Accurate-T-staging vs over-T-staging, P = 0.012; Accurate-T-staging vs under-T-staging, P = 0.015