Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 11;12(9):e009303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009303

Table 2.

Diagnostic Performance of the Machine-Learning Algorithm for Automated Evaluation of LVEF in Terms of its Ability to Identify Patients With Severely Reduced LV Function (EF ≤35%)

Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy κ
Auto EF 0.90 0.92 0.96 0.83 0.92 0.806
(95% CI) (0.82–0.95) (0.88–0.95) (0.92–0.98) (0.74–0.89) (0.88–0.95) (0.733–0.880)
Clinical reads 0.93 0.87 0.97 0.74 0.89 0.745
(95% CI) (0.76–0.99) (0.77–0.93) (0.89–0.99) (0.58–0.86) (0.81–0.94) (0.606–0.885)

Data in parentheses represent 95% CI. EF indicates ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; NPV, indicates negative predictive value; and PPV, positive predictive value.