Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun 7;116:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.06.003

Table 1. Characteristics of Participants with Subsysndromal OCPD Compared to Controls.

Subsyndromal OCPD (N=104) Healthy Controls (N=52) t Uncorrected p
Age, years 24.8 (2.4) 24.4 (2.4) 1.088 0.279
Gender, Female, N[%] 43 [41.4%] 27 [51.9%] 1.564 LR 0.211
Education score 3.5 (0.9) 3.6 (1.0) -0.611 0.543
Barratt Impulsivity Questionnaire, total 67.6 (13.1) 62.0 (10.3) 2.875 0.005 *
Padua Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, total 24.8 (22.8) 15.2 (17.4) 2.859 0.005 *
IED ED errors 11.7 (10.5) 10.0 (9.4) 1.042 0.299
SST SSRT, msec 185.1 (73.6) 176.9 (52.3) 0.805 0.422
CGT Proportion bet 0.56 (0.14) 0.54 (0.13) 0.884 0.379
CGT Quality of Decisions 0.93 (0.09) 0.95 (0.09) -0.942 0.349
CGT Risk Adjustment 1.1 (1.2) 1.3 (1.1) -0.100 0.320

LR: Likelihood Ratio chi-square test, df=2.

*

Significant a p<0.05 Bonferroni corrected.

IED = Intra-Dimensional/Extra-Dimensional shift task; ED = extra-dimensional shift; SST =Stop Signal Task; SSRT; Stop Signal Reaction Time; CGT = Cambridge Gamble Task.