Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD002233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002233.pub2

Comparison 4. EVS versus octreotide.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Failure, rebleeding, mortality, adverse events 10   Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Failure to control bleeding 10 1128 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.04]
1.2 Five‐day failure rate 2 132 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐0.30, 0.03]
1.3 two to five‐day failure 4 341 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.05 [‐0.14, 0.04]
1.4 Rebleeding 9 1064 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.02 [‐0.03, 0.08]
1.5 Rebleeding before other elective treatments 5 486 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]
1.6 Mortality 10 1128 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]
1.7 Mortality before other elective treatments 5 531 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.00 [‐0.05, 0.04]
1.8 Adverse events 6 529 Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.06 [‐0.03, 0.15]
2 Transfusions 5 391 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.20 [‐0.60, 0.20]