Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD002233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002233.pub2

Shaikh 2002.

Methods Randomisation sequence: method of generation not reported. Allocation concealment: method not reported. No information reported on completion of treatment as per protocol in all patients neither on the number of patients lost to the follow‐up. Follow‐up 30 days. Intention‐to‐treat analysis not assessable.
Participants Country: Pakistan. Cirrhotic patients with endoscopy‐proven variceal bleeding. Aetiology mostly HBV and HCV. 
 Exclusion: bleeding from causes different from oesophageal varices;HCC; age more than 75; non cirrhotic portal hypertension.
Interventions EVS: intra injection 4 to 6 ml of 50% ethanolamine on day 1,8,15,29;max volume per session not reported. 
 Control: 48‐hour continuous iv infusion of octreotide 50 µg/h followed by subcutaneous 50 µg injections every eight hours for 3 days.
Outcomes 4‐hour control of bleeding; early re‐bleeding; 30‐day re‐bleeding; 30‐day mortality.
Notes This is a three group randomised trial: EVS, EVS plus octreotide, octreotide alone. Only the two groups, ie, EVS vs octreotide are of interest to this review.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Unclear
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Unclear