Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;2016(2):CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2

32.

32

Forest plot demonstrating the direct comparison between 2D‐MRI and 3D‐MRI for USL involvement. Plot shows study‐specific paired estimates of sensitivity and specificity (squares) with 95% CI (black line) and country in which the study was conducted. FN: false negative; FP: false positive; TN: true negative; TP: true positive. Modifications to the conventional technique are presented as 'modified method'.