Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;2016(1):CD002764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002764.pub2

Furuya 2012.

Methods Retrospective review
Participants 24 patients with advanced gynaecological cancer, who developed bowel obstruction and later died with gynaecological cancer between 1996 and 2010 in a single centre
Interventions Surgical intervention 11 patients: 8 ileostomy; 3 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Conservative management 13 patients
Outcomes Average survival period: surgical 101 days; conservative 51 days
Oral intake achieved: ileostomy 88%; PEG 100%; conservative 50%
Oral intake length: ileostomy 50 days; PEG 48 days; conservative 10 days
Rate of outpatient: ileostomy 50%; PEG 66%; conservative 21%
Period at home: ileostomy 29 days; PEG 40 days; conservative 8 days
Notes Poster abstract
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Retrospective review of case notes.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Intervention clinical decision. Surgical, endoscopic or conservative
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Intervention clinical decision. Surgical, endoscopic or conservative
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Intervention clinical decision. Surgical, endoscopic or conservative
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Patient notes analysed retrospectively
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes reported for all 24 patients
Results reported by surgical intervention