Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;4(1):E19–E26. doi: 10.1055/a-1101-5750

Table 2 Power Output and Cadence during Power Profile Test and XCO Race (n=22).

PPT Race LoA LoA norm. n r Difference
Mean±SD Mean±SD Low Up Low Up Abs. CI low CI up Norm. n
PO TT 10 [W] 855±204 781±157 −171 319 −20 37 0.79* 74* 18 129 8%
PO TT 30 [W] 588±129 549±119 −110 187 −17 31 0.82* 39* 5 72 7%
PO TT 60 [W] 397±90 460±107 −179 53 −41 12 0.83* −63* −89 −37 −15%
PO TT 300 [W] 261±55 293±54 −86 20 −32 7 0.88* −33* −45 −21 −12%
CAD TT 10 [rpm] 122±17 111±12 −17 41 −14 34 0.55* 12* 5 18 10%
CAD TT 30 [rpm] 109±12 100±8 −14 32 −13 30 0.41 9* 4 14 8%
CAD TT 60 [rpm] 110±11 91±6 −3 42 −2 40 0.26 20* 15 25 19%
CAD TT 300 [rpm] 103±5 84±5 7 32 7 35 0.22 20* 17 22 21%

PPT, Power Profile Test; PO, cycling power output; CAD, cadence/pedalling frequency; TT 10–300 , time trials lasting 10–300 s (sprint/maximal effort); LoA, lower/upper 95% limits of agreement; n , normalized values (PPT-Race)/((PPT+Race)/2) [%]; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; *=p<0.05; Abs., referring absolute values; CI, lower/upper 95% confidence interval of the difference.