Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;10:5653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62530-w

Table 3.

Agonist potencies and efficacies at the human µOR and δOR of N-methylmorphinans 14 and their respective N-phenethy analogues 1a4a in the cAMP accumulation assay.

Compound µORa δORa
EC50 (nM) % stim. EC50 (nM) % stim.
Morphine (1) 13.5 ± 2.83 106 ± 9 374 ± 24 94 ± 18
1a 2.87 ± 0.91* 107 ± 5 315 ± 110 105 ± 8
Oxymorphone (2) 2.48 ± 0.79 109 ± 2 56.9 ± 5.1 87 ± 16
2a 0.59 ± 0.04* 97 ± 6 50.1 ± 16.2 99 ± 18
14-OMO (3) 0.19 ± 0.14 90 ± 8 5.42 ± 0.93 98 ± 3
3a 0.078 ± 0.004 88 ± 12 0.60 ± 0.07** 93 ± 2
14-MM (4) 0.31 ± 0.07 93 ± 5 4.06 ± 0.89 99 ± 8
4a 0.15 ± 0.07 98 ± 12 0.55 ± 0.16* 96 ± 4

aDetermined in the forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation assay using CHO cells co-expressing the human opioid receptors and the cAMP biosensor GloSensor-22F (CHO-hµOR-p22F or CHO-hδOR-p22F cells). Percentage stimulation (% stim.) relative to the agonist DAMGO (µOR) or DPDPE (δOR). Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3–4). *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 for N-methylmorphinans vs. respective N-phenethyl analogues (unpaired t-test).