Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;2020:5169278. doi: 10.1155/2020/5169278

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Neoadjuvant treatment Adjuvant treatment
Study Phase N MF Chemotherapy (wks) Anti-HER2 therapy Chemotherapy (wks) Anti-HER2 therapy Arms LN+ patients (%) HR+ patients (%) Duration# (wks) Outcomes
Adjuvant setting
ExteNET III 2840 5.2 y UNK T or none UNK T + N 1420 1085 (76) 816 (57) 52 DFS, IDFS, OS, and safety
(Martin1 2017a; Martin2 2017a; Chan 2016) T 1420 1084 (76) 815 (57)
ALTTO III 8381 6.9 y UNK None Design 1: chemotherapy × (12–18)
Design 2: A × (9–12) + Taxane × 12
Design 2B: (Doc + Carb) × 18
T + Lb 2093 1080 (52) 1203 (57) 52 DFS, OS, and safety
(Piccart-Gebhart 2016; Moreno-Aspitia1 2017b; Moreno-Aspitia2 2017b) T⟶Lb 2091 1078 (52) 1205 (58) T12⟶L34
T 2097 1072 (51) 1200 (57) 52

APHINITY (Von Minckwitz 2017) III 4805 3.8 y None None FEC × (9–12) + Doc/Pal × 12; or AC/EC × (8–12) + Doc/Pal × 12; or (Doc + Carb)×18 T + P 2400 1503 (63) 1536 (64) 52 IDFS, DFS, OS, and safety
T 2405 1502 (62) 1546 (64)

Neoadjuvant setting
EORTC 10054 IIb 128 NR Doc × 9 + FEC × 9 L + T NR T 52 33 (64) 25 (48) 9 pCR (breast + nodes), pCR (breast), response rates, and safety
(Bonnefoi 2014) T 53 36 (68) 27 (51)

CALGB 40601 III 295 NR wP × 16 L + T AC × (8–12) T 117 NR 69 (59) 16 pCR (breast + nodes) and safety
(Carey 2016) T 118 70 (59)

NeoALTTO III 455 3.84 y wP × 12w L + T FEC × 9 T + L 152 UNK 77 (51) 52 pCR (breast + nodes), pCR (breast), ORR, safety, DFS, EFS, and OS
(Baselga 2012; de Azambuja 2014) T T 149 75 (50)

CHER-LOB IIb 121 NR wP × 12 + FEC × 12 L + T NR T 46 NR 28 (61) 26 pCR (breast + nodes) and clinical objective responses
(Guarneri 2012; Guarneri 2015) T 36 21 (58)

NeoSphere II 417 5 y D × 12 T + P FEC × 9 T 107 75 (70) 50 (47) 12 pCR(breast) and pCR (breast + nodes)
(Gianni 2012; Gianni 2016) None T + P D × 12 <+ FEC × 9 107 75 (70) 51 (48) Clinical response rate, safety, PFS, and DFS
D × 12 T FEC×9 107 75 (70) 50 (47)

LPT109096 II 100 NR FEC × 12 + wP × 12 T + L UNK UNK 33 20 (61) 20 (61) 26 pCR (breast + nodes), clinical complete response (CCR), and safety
(Holmes 2013) T 33 15 (45) 15 (45)

NSABP B-41 III 519 5 y AC × 12 + wP × 12 T + L None T 174 85 (49) 108 (62) 12 pCR(breast), pCR (breast + nodes), clinical complete response, safety, and OS
(Robidoux 2013; Robidoux 2016) T 181 92 (51) 122 (67)

MF: median follow-up; A: anthracycline; FEC: fluorouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide; Doc: docetaxel; Carb: carboplatin; Pal: paclitaxel; wP: weekly paclitaxel; wk: week; HR+: hormone receptor positive; LN+: lymph node positive; T: trastuzumab; L: lapatinib; P: pertuzumab; N: neratinib; T + L: trastuzumab plus lapatinib; T ⟶ L: trastuzumab followed by lapatinib; NR: unreported; UNK: unknown. #Duration of dual anti-HER2 therapy.Studies with more than one publication. aIn the ExteNET trial (Martin 2017), lymph node- (LN-) positive patients were divided into two subgroups, 1–3 positive LN (Martin1 2017) and ≥4 positive LN (Martin2 2017), for the subgroup analysis of LN status. b In the ALTTO trial (Moreno-Aspitia 2017), there were two experimental groups (trastuzumab plus lapatinib group (Moreno-Aspitia1 2017) and trastuzumab followed by lapatinib group (Moreno-Aspitia2 2017).