Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2019 Dec 16;528(8):1436–1456. doi: 10.1002/cne.24834

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Relative prevalence and post-synaptic targets of GABAergic and glutamatergic terminals in the CM. (a) Total density of each terminal sub-type in the CM of control (N = 4) and parkinsonian (N=3) monkeys. (b-d) Percentage of each terminal subtype forming synaptic contact with dendritic profiles of different sizes in control (N=4-6) and parkinsonian (N=3-5) monkeys. Lines inside boxes indicate medians, top and bottom of boxes indicate 1st and 3rd quartile respectively, and whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Significant difference in As-type terminals and S2-type terminals in control conditions p=0.019 <0.05, Dunn’s Method One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks.