Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2020 Jan 24;71(5):1802–1812. doi: 10.1002/hep.30926

TABLE 3.

Univariable and Multivariable Competing Risk Analysis for Graft Failure After LT

Univariable* Multivariable*
Characteristic Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P
Presumed Unauthorized Immigrants (vs. Resident) 0.74 (0.40–1.39) 0.36 0.74 (0.40–1.34) 0.32
Sex (Male) 1.03 (0.97–1.10) 0.31
Age (per Year) 1.01 (1.00–1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00–1.01) <0.001
Caucasian 0.97 (0.90–1.04) 0.38
College Education 0.95 (0.90–1.01) 0.12
Private Insurance 0.87 (0.81–0.93) <0.001 0.90 (0.84–0.96) 0.002
Portal Vein Thrombosis at LT 1.34 (1.24–1.44) <0.001 1.32 (1.23–1.42) <0.001
MELD at LT 1.01 (1.00–1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.001
Mechanical Ventilation at LT 1.90 (1.68–2.15) <0.001 1.92 (1.67–2.21) <0.001
Wait Time of Region
 Low Ref Ref
 Medium 1.10 (0.99–1.22) 0.08
 High 1.02 (0.92–1.14) 0.65
Simultaneous Liver Kidney Recipient 0.99 (0.89–1.11) 0.93
Donor Risk Index 1.50 (1.37–1.65) <0.001 1.54 (1.41–1.69) <0.001
*

Adjusted for center clustering.

UNOS regions were divided into low (3, 6, 10, 11), medium (2, 4, 7, 8), and high wait time (1, 5, 9) regions by waitlist time.