Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2020 Feb 13;184:109255. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109255

Table 3:

Ratio difference in urinary OPE metabolite concentration per interquartile range (IQR) increase in dust OPE parent compound concentration and loading

Compounds Time point Dust concentration (95% CI) Dust loading (95% CI) Estimated Ingestion (95% CI)
TCEP ➔ BCEP (Dust IQR) 8.2-fold increase (237-1950 ng/g) 10.6-fold increase (53-562 ng/m2) 9.6-fold increase (0.06-0.57 ng/kg/day)

16 week metabolite 1.04 (0.84-1.28) 1.03 (0.85-1.23) 1.01 (0.81-1.26)
26 week metabolite 1.39 (1.12-1.72) 1.10 (0.92-1.33) 1.32 (1.08-1.70)
Delivery metabolite 1.30 (1.04-1.63) 1.21 (0.99-1.48) 1.27 (1.01-1.60)

TDCIPP ➔ BDCIPP (Dust IQR) 4.4-fold increase (880-3890 ng/g) 5.2-fold increase (193-1011 ng/m2) 4.6-fold increase (0.23-1.04 ng/kg/day)

16 week metabolite 1.10 (0.96-1.26) 0.99 (0.86-1.13) 1.09 (0.95-1.26)
26 week metabolite 1.21 (1.05-1.39) 0.99 (0.86-1.15) 1.18 (1.03-1.37)
Delivery metabolite 1.07 (0.92-1.23) 1.07 (0.87-1.17) 1.03 (0.90-1.20)

TPHP ➔ DPHP (Dust IQR) 4.0-fold increase (532-2120 ng/g) 6.8-fold increase (92-632 ng/m2) 6.2-fold increase (0.14-0.57 ng/kg/day)

16 week metabolite 1.16 (1.01-1.32) 1.26 (1.06-1.49) 1.17 (1.02-1.34)
26 week metabolite 1.04 (0.91-1.20) 1.08 (0.91-1.29) 1.04 (0.90-1.19)
Delivery metabolite 0.97 (0.84-1.13) 0.94 (0.78-1.13) 0.96 (0.83-1.11)

Fold increases represent differences from the 25th to 75th percentile of dust concentrations.

Ratio changes are from fully-adjusted regression models presented in Table 2.

CI: confidence interval