Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jan 25;106(5):998–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.038

Table 2.

Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI parameters between pathologic complete response (TRG 1) and non-pathologic complete response (TRG 2–4), as well as between good response (TRG 1–2) and poor response (TRG 3–4).

Median (IQR) p-value* Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value c-statistic
pCR (TRG 1) (n=18) non-pCR (TRG 2–4) (n=51)
During treatment ΔSUVmean (%) −27 (−38, −6) −19 (−33, −3) 0.246 0.264 0.59
ΔSUVmax (%) −29 (−46, −8) −23 (−35, −2) 0.408 0.408 0.57
ΔTLGduring (%) −54 (−64, −23) −20 (−50, 10) 0.020 0.052 0.69
ΔADCduring(%) 28 (15, 39) 11 (4, 17) 0.001 0.008 0.77
Post treatment ΔSUVmean (%) −63 (−68, −49) −42 (−58, −16) 0.003 0.016 0.74
ΔSUVmax (%) −68 (−78, −58) −54 (−71, −31) 0.026 0.052 0.68
ΔTLGpost (%) −86 (−93, −81) −65 (−88, −32) 0.006 0.024 0.72
ΔADCpost (%) 34 (13, 46) 20 (10, 38) 0.139 0.201 0.63
Median (IQR) p-value* Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value c-statistic
GR (TRG 1–2) (n=43) non-GR (TRG 3–4) (n=26)
During treatment ΔSUVmean (%) −26 (−42, −5) −19 (−27, −2) 0.054 0.086 0.64
ΔSUVmax (%) −31 (−44, −14) −12 (−29, 2) 0.016 0.051 0.67
ΔTLGduring (%) −37 (−62, −9) −17 (−38, 20) 0.024 0.052 0.66
ΔADCduring (%) 20 (13, 33) 7.3 (0, 11) <0.001 0.008 0.84
Post treatment ΔSUVmean (%) −51 (−66, −34) −42 (−56, −11) 0.042 0.075 0.65
ΔSUVmax (%) −63 (−76, −44) −53 (−74, −26) 0.187 0.230 0.60
ΔTLGpost (%) −81 (−89, −54) −64 (−88, −35) 0.248 0.264 0.59
ΔADCpost (%) 24 (13, 44) 21 (6, 30) 0.151 0.201 0.61
*

p-value calculated based on Mann-Whitney U test

ADC apparent diffusion coefficient; c-statistic concordance statistic; GR good response; IQR interquartile range; pCR pathologic complete response; SD standard deviation; SUV standardized uptake value; TLG tumor lesion glycolysis; TRG tumor regression grade