Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e035004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035004

Table 1.

Comparison of patient characteristics

All patients Non-emergency Included in study
n 21 779 1876 1089
By region (10917/10862) (1005/871) (602/487)
Female (%) 51.9 (51.3–52.6) 52.1 (49.5–54.8) 53.3 (50.3–56.2)
By region (52.1/51.8) (50.7/53.9) (51.8/55)
Age (median) 69 (68–69) 57 (56–60) 61 (59–64)
By region (70/67) (61/52) (66/57)
Weekday (%) 86.1 (85.5–86.5) 85.5 (83.9–87) 85.6 (83.3–87.6)
By region (85.9/86.3) (84.6/86.6) (85.5/85.6)
Daytime* (%) 58.8 (58.1–59.4) 47.9 (45.6–50.3) 47.9 (45.1–51)
By region (58.9/58.6) (46.5/49.5) (48.2/47.6)
Frequent caller (%) 4 (3.7–4.2) 13.7 (11.7–15.6) 15.7 (13.5–17.8)
By region (5.3/2.5) (18.7/7.1) (21.8/8.2)
Region 2 (%) 49.9 (49.3–50.5) 46.4 (44.1–48.9) 44.7 (41.8–47.7)
By region (0/100) (0/100) (0/100)
CDSS used (%) 83.9 (83.4–84.4) 60.3 (57.9–62.6) 69.8 (66.9–72.4)
By region (84.6/83.2) (61.8/58.7) (68.4/71.5)
Onward referral (%) 4.6 (4.3–4.9) 53.6 (51.5–55.9) 52.3 (49.3–55.3)
By region (5.6/3.6) (61.3/44.8) (61.8/40.7)
Missing/invalid PIN (%) 9 (8.6–9.3) 29.9 (27.8–31.9) 0 (0–0)
By region 7.9/10.1 26.2/34.1 0/0

This table presents descriptive statistics for all patients contacting the EMD centre during the study period, patients with a non-emergency disposition meeting the inclusion criteria for the study and the patient cohort following the application of the exclusion criteria. All statistics are presented with their bootstrapped 95% CIs. Statistics are presented for each region separately.

*Defined as between 07:00 and 17:00.

†Patients referred to the nursing advice line, alternate transport to a non-ED destination, an on-site healthcare provider, a mobile care team or the poison control centre, as compared with patients receiving advice only.

CDSS, clinical decision support system; EMD, emergency medical dispatch.