Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):e034568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034568

Table 3.

Reporting quality

Items Reported, n (%) Not reported, n (%) Unclear, n (%)
Methods
 Data source 24 (86) 0 (0) 4 (14)
 Data split methods 28 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Test set eligibility criteria (evaluation set) 23 (82) 5 (18) 0 (0)
Results
 Baseline characteristic 17 (61) 11 (39) 0 (0)
 Diagnosis/non-diagnosis classification 23 (82) 4 (14) 1 (4)
 Flow diagram 10 (36) 18 (64) 0 (0)
 Disease severity 8 (29) 18 (64) 2 (7)
 Alternative diagnosis 10 (36) 18 (64) 0 (0)
 Use of reporting guideline 0 (0) 28 (100) 0 (0)