Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;15:2059–2070. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S240449

Table 3.

Analysis of Distributed Tendency of FA in the Tissues. (n=6)

FA FA-SMEDDS RE (-folds)
AUC0-t (h·μg/mL) DP (%) AUC0-t (h·μg/mL) DP (%)
Heart 34.48 ± 4.36 4.6 ± 0.8 54.33 ± 27.87 5.5 ± 2.7 1.20 ± 0.59
Liver 71.24 ± 16.61 9.3 ± 1.6 123.94 ± 25.40** 12.9 ± 3.2* 1.39 ± 0.35
Spleen 13.21 ± 4.53 1.8 ± 0.8 34.54 ± 13.32* 3.6 ± 1.5* 1.98 ± 0.81
Lung 57.41 ± 11.65 7.6 ± 1.7 77.69 ± 20.34 8.2 ± 2.8 1.08 ± 0.37
Kidney 583.68 ± 97.91 76.1 ± 3.4 585.86 ± 134.70 59.4 ± 7.7** 0.78 ± 0.10
Brain 4.70 ± 1.83 0.7 ± 0.4 99.76 ± 14.04** 10.4 ± 2.3** 14.87 ± 3.34
Total 764.72 ± 104.04 100 976.12 ± 104.47 100

Notes: These results indicate that SMEDD change the distribution tendency of FA. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, vs FA group.

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the concentration–time curve; DP, Distribution percentage; RE, Relative intake efficiency.