Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 7;2014(10):CD004075. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004075.pub4

Comparison 6. Secondary outcomes: maternal: FPO + CTG versus fetal ECG + CTG.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Caesarean section for nonreassuring fetal status 1 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.71 [1.01, 2.88]
2 Caesarean section for dystocia 1 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.3 [0.60, 2.81]
3 Operative birth (caesarean section, forceps, vacuum) 1 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.20 [1.00, 1.45]
4 Operative birth (caesarean section, forceps, vacuum) for nonreassuring fetal status 1 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.88, 1.70]