Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2020 Jan 30;105:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106329

Table 4.

Mean comparison of outcomes for LCA

2: HI FREQ-PLANT 3: MOD FREQ PLANT+ED 4: LOW FREQ-PLANT 5: LOW FREQ-ED
Reference Class M SE Wald p Wald p Wald p Wald p
Cannabis Consequences
Class 1: HI FREQ-ALL PROD 5.93 0.27 1.62 .20 21.61 <.001 176.90 <.001 157.13 <.001
Class 2: HI FREQ-PLANT 5.30 0.40 - - 3.80 .05 47.21 <.001 43.35 <.001
Class 3: MOD FREQ-PLANT +ED 3.23 0.18 - - - - 66.48 <.001 55.70 <.001
Class 4: LOW FREQ-PLANT 0.17 0.03 - - - - - - 1.02 .31
Class 5: LOW FREQ-ED 0.37 0.19 - - - - - - - -
CUDIT-R
Class 1: HI FREQ-ALL PROD 12.63 0.34 5.16 .02 20.65 <.001 61.87 <.001 52.66 <.001
Class 2: HI FREQ-PLANT 10.78 0.43 - - 4.67 .03 28.72 <.001 22.44 <.001
Class 3: MOD FREQ-PLANT +ED 6.02 0.47 - - - - 112.72 <.001 5.35 .02
Class 4: LOW FREQ-PLANT 1.72 0.99 - - - - - - 2.36 .12
Class 5: LOW FREQ-ED 2.71 0.33 - - - - - - - -

Note. Test statistics from Wald chi-square difference tests. ORs represent comparisons between classes specified in columns versus reference classes specified in rows.