Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 10;2016(2):CD012087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012087

Shirado 2010.

Methods RCT
Participants 201 participants, 112 women, 89 men; mean age 42.2 years
Inclusion: age 20 to 64 years, nonspecific chronic low back pain ≥ 3 months without radicular pain, ≥ 70° at straight leg raising test, negative femoral nerve stretching test, no superficial sensory deficits, muscle strength ≥ 4/5
Exclusion: low back pain due to tumours, infections, fractures, previous back surgery, severe osteoporosis, psychiatric disorders, liver and renal dysfunction, pregnancy, medication for cardiac failure, history of cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction, or both, in previous 6 months
Interventions NSAID (i): 1 of the following 3 NSAIDs were prescribed: loxoprofen sodium 180 mg/day; diclofenac sodium 75 mg/day; zaltoprofen 240 mg/day, 12 weeks
Reference treatment (ii): exercise programme with trunk muscle strengthening and stretching, 12 weeks
Outcomes Mean change from baseline to 8 weeks on 100 mm VAS was not different between (i) and (ii), P = 0.33
Mean change from baseline to 8 weeks on RDQ in favour of (ii), P = 0.02
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated 4 block randomization
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Office manager concealed allocation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias): All outcomes ‐ Patients 
 All outcomes High risk NSAIDs versus exercise
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias): All outcomes ‐ Care providers 
 All outcomes High risk NSAIDs versus exercise
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias): All outcomes ‐ Outcome assessors 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessor was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): All outcomes ‐ Drop‐outs 
 All outcomes Low risk Two in exercise, 6 in NSAIDs.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis 
 All outcomes High risk No ITT analysis performed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk study protocol not attainable
Similarity of baseline characteristics Low risk Baseline characteristics were similar
Co‐interventions avoided or similar Unclear risk Rescue medication not mentioned
Compliance acceptable Unclear risk Compliance not mentioned
Timing outcome assessments similar Low risk Timing similar