Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 21;11(3):230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2017.08.005

Table 2.

Mean Scores for Nursing Intention of Nurses According to General Characteristics and Conditions During the MERS Outbreak.

Variables Categories 1st hand
2nd hand
Group comparison: 1st hand vs. 2nd hand
Mean ± SD t or F p Mean ± SD t or F p t p
Personal characteristics
Gender Female 16.94 ± 2.51 −0.81 .419 15.60 ± 2.73 −0.17 .866 −4.44 <.001
Male 15.50 ± 0.71 15.33 ± 3.21 −0.07 .950
Age (yr) 20–29 16.87 ± 2.62 2.11 .100 15.62 ± 3.03 0.31 .818 −2.67 .008
30–39 16.69 ± 2.56 15.32 ± 2.22 −2.68 .009
40–49 17.06 ± 2.11 16.00 ± 2.42 −1.62 .135
≥50 17.50 ± 3.03 20.00 ± 1.41 1.11 .293
Marriage No 16.86 ± 2.58 −0.37 .713 15.37 ± 2.87 −1.52 .131 −3.77 .001
Yes 17.02 ± 2.39 16.03 ± 2.40 −2.20 .030
No. of child 0 16.80 ± 2.57 1.41 .241 15.36 ± 2.82 0.62 .606 −3.76 .001
1 17.14 ± 2.28 16.41 ± 2.32 −0.97 .340
2 17.28 ± 2.39 16.18 ± 2.53 −1.54 .130
≥3 16.00 ± 2.76 15.20 ± 2.59 −0.49 .634
Career-related characteristics
Clinical experience (yr) <5 17.08 ± 2.55 0.58 .560 15.72 ± 3.04 0.81 .449 −2.91 .004
5–10 16.42 ± 2.55 15.23 ± 2.31 −2.12 .037
>10 17.04 ± 2.39 15.78 ± 2.40 −2.37 .020
Position Staff nurse 16.89 ± 2.62 −0.46 .646 15.56 ± 2.68 −1.17 .245 −4.19 <.001
Head nurse 17.09 ± 1.69 17.00 ± 4.18 −0.05 .964
Working division Ward 16.90 ± 2.55 1.10 .351 15.54 ± 2.94 0.59 .625 −3.57 .001
Outpatient 17.29 ± 4.03 16.00 ± 3.10 −0.64 .538
Special carea 16.57 ± 2.08 15.32 ± 1.98 −2.41 .019
Other careb 17.67 ± 1.92 17.11 ± 1.45 −0.72 .478
Duty type 8-hour shifts 16.90 ± 2.60 2.78 .065 15.45 ± 2.77 0.28 .754 −4.14 <.001
Daytime only 18.00 ± 1.00 14.00 ± 1.73 −3.46 .026
Other typec 16.89 ± 2.29 16.71 ± 2.26 −0.31 .760
Daily contact with patients Yes 16.94 ± 2.56 −0.25 .804 15.55 ± 2.77 1.85 .093 −4.38 <.001
No 16.75 ± 1.66 16.50 ± 1.31 −0.36 .725
Hospital condition during the outbreak
Hospital Type Treat with authorized beds 17.66 ± 2.55 11.79 <.001 16.68 ± 2.45 11.32 <.001 −2.49 .014
Treat without authorized beds 16.07 ± 1.62 14.71 ± 2.14 −2.21 .032
Screening 15.65 ± 2.03 14.80 ± 2.94 −1.71 .116
Goods supply Sufficient 17.10 ± 2.45 3.47 .034§ 15.91 ± 2.58 2.04 .134 −3.67 .001
Insufficient 16.44 ± 3.03 14.52 ± 3.53 −1.79 .065
unknown 15.60 ± 1.58 14.95 ± 2.11 −0.86 .399
Personal condition regarding the outbreak
Isolation experience Yes 16.17 ± 2.48 0.76 .451 15.00 ± 0.00 0.22 .826 −0.43 .682
No 16.96 ± 2.50 15.60 ± 2.73 −4.46 <.001
Prior knowledge about MERS A lot 17.26 ± 2.47 0.26 .768 16.07 ± 2.06 2.80 .064 −1.47 .152
Moderate 16.47 ± 2.18 15.60 ± 2.95 −2.28 .032
A little 17.51 ± 2.86 15.47 ± 2.42 −3.82 .001

Note. ANOVA = analysis of variance; MERS = Middle East respiratory syndrome; SD = standard deviation.

Student's t tests and ANOVA were performed. Post hoc analysis was done with Scheffe test. P < .05 were considered as statistically significant.

a

Special care division included emergency care unit, operation room, and delivery room.

b

Other care included medical support divisions such as administration, laboratory, and medical check-up.

c

Other duty type included nighttime only, and full-time.

Significant differences versus all other groups.

Significant difference versus screening.

§

Although significant, post hoc analysis results revealed no significant differences between the groups.