Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;40:447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.11.038

Table 1.

Matrix of the simple centroid mixture design and experiment data of extraction yield, NO production and IL-6 production.

Run Independent variablesa
Response variablesb
X1 X2 X3 Y1c Y2c Y3c
1 1.00 0.00 0.00 26.7 ± 0.5 33.3 ± 1.4 22.3 ± 0.5
2 0.00 1.00 0.00 47.3 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 0.2
3 0.00 0.00 1.00 56.6 ± 1.1 3.8 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.3
4 0.50 0.50 0.00 33.5 ± 0.1 21.8 ± 1.2 8.7 ± 1.1
5 0.50 0.00 0.50 30.3 ± 0.1 9.6 ± 0.4 4.4 ± 0.6
6 0.00 0.50 0.50 51.7 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.6 0.7 ± 0.1
7 0.33 0.33 0.33 35.4 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.7 1.4 ± 0.4
8 0.67 0.17 0.17 28.5 ± 0.1 25.2 ± 1.1 11.8 ± 0.3
9 0.17 0.67 0.17 41.8 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.2
10 0.17 0.17 0.67 44.0 ± 0.6 1.0 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.5
a

Independent variables: X1, Rhodiola crenulata; X2, Panax quinquefolius; X3, Astragalus membranaceus.

b

Response variables: Y1, extraction yield; Y2, the percentage of NO production in the LPS-induced control; Y3, the percentage of IL-6 production in the LPS-induced control

c

All values are mean ± SD of triplicate determinations.