Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nurs Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;69(1):31–41. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000392

Table 2.

Comparison of and Difference between Baseline and End of Study Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Scores for Women with Baseline and End of Study Data

Total N = 260
μ (SD)
Striving n = 85
μ (SD)
Boning Up n = 88
μ (SD)
Wait List n = 87
μ (SD)

Total Hip BMD
 Baseline 1.010 (.135) 1.018 (.144) .994 (.122) 1.020 (.138)
 EoS 1.006 (.137) 1.012 (.147) .990 (.123) 1.017 (140)
 Difference −.004 (.026 −.006 (.018) −.003 (.034) −.003 (.022)

Femoral Neck BMD
 Baseline
 EoS .963 (.128) .967 (.133) .942 (.118) .980 (.130)
Difference .955 (.129) .956 (.135) .9364 (.119) .972 (.132)
−.008 (.028) −.0116 (.025) −.006 (.026) −.007 (.032)

Spine Total*BMD
 Baseline 1.208 (.163) 1.195 (.144) 1.210 (.174) 1.22 (.170)
 EoS 1.200 (.167) 1.188 (.152) 1.200 (.176) 1.212 (.173)
 Difference −.008 (.034) −.007 (.033) −.009 (.034) −.009 (.039)

TBS
 Baseline 1.406 (.120) 1.400 (.121) 1.402 (.124) 1.416 (.117)
 EoS 1.412 (.108) 1.408 (.113) 1.409 (.109) 1.419 (.102)
 Difference .006 (.082) .007 (.091) .007 (.080) .002 (.077)

Note. EoS = End of Study; TBS = Trabecular Bone Score; BMD = Bone Mineral Density (g/cm2)

*

Note: Spine BMD baseline and end of study for 284 women rather than 290 because 6 women had some form of metal (e.g., surgical repair or bullet) in at least one or more vertebra and as such, a valid measurement of L1-L4 spine BMD could not obtained.