Table 2.

Implementation access level relevance

	N	%	Articles
Demand-side relevancea	44	86.3
Patient/client-level	40	78.4	[13, 25–33, 35–38, 40, 42–45, 47, 49, 50, 53–55, 58–68, 70, 71, 73, 74]
Community engagement/outreach	30	58.9	[25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 43, 47, 48, 50, 55, 58–61, 63–71, 74, 75]
Supply-side relevancea	35	68.6
Human resources/provider capacity	30	58.9	[13, 25, 27, 28, 31, 33–35, 39–47, 49, 50, 54, 55, 58–60, 63, 65, 66, 68–70]
“Other”b health system relevance	25	49.0	[13, 25, 27, 29–31, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 44, 46, 47, 49, 52, 59, 60, 65–70, 74]
Clinical services (quality)	13	25.5	[13, 27–29, 33, 35, 45–47, 59, 63, 65, 68]
Health system (policy)	12	23.5	[25, 34, 39, 44, 47, 49, 52, 60, 65, 67, 69, 74]
Both Demand and Supply-side relevance	31	60.8	[13, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 40–45, 47, 49, 50, 54, 55, 58–60, 63, 65–70, 74]

Based on Levesque Patient-Centered Access to Healthcare Framework [22]

^aNot mutually exclusive

^b”Other” such as financing, information systems, equipment / resources management, leadership / governance