Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;10:5682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62507-9

Table 3.

QTLs detected through composite interval mapping in the BC1 population.

Trait QTL name Chr LOD peak LOD peak position(cM) Left marker Right marker 95% CI(cM) Additive effect R2(%)
WCW qtl1-1 9 3.60 51.81 mk14610 mk14818 51.54–56.30 0.16 10.67
WCW qtl1-2 26 3.27 82.01 mk49168 mk49084 81.00–86.29 0.15 9.60
WCW qtl1-3 26 3.23 89.71 mk49031 mk49007 89.15–90.68 0.15 9.52
CSW qtl2-1 1 4.66 104.51 mk38 mk76 99.90–107.52 0.03 13.48
CSW qtl2-2 23 4.89 164.21 mk41983 mk41914 159.04–167.58 0.03 13.68
CSW qtl2-3 23 4.89 170.21 mk41872 mk41877 169.09–173.23 0.03 13.07
CSW qtl2-4 28 3.94 79.91 mk50998 mk51009 78.76–80.40 −0.10 10.27
CSR qtl3-1 13 3.69 0.01 mk26265 mk26369 0–1.86 0.04 12.51
PW qtl4-1 1 3.54 108.61 mk76 mk75 108.52–110.59 0.15 12.70
PW qtl4-2 22 4.07 81.21 mk40213 mk40245 78.98–83.49 0.30 12.54
PW qtl4-3 22 3.50 86.81 mk40227 mk40330 85.72–90.72 0.30 10.96

Chr, chromosome; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; R2, percentage of phenotypic variation explained by the QTL.