Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;39(1):103–111. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.19.082

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression on the changes of anemia-related variables after HDF conversion in hemodialysis patients

Laboratory measure Patient groups Changes after conversion Univariate analysis Multivariate analysisa


Unstandardized β (95% CI) P value Unstandardized β (95% CI) P value
Hemoglobin (g/dL) HD group 0.2 ± 1.3 Reference Reference
OL-HDF group 0.6 ± 1.2 0.47 (0.04, 0.90) 0.034 0.74 (0.18, 1.30) 0.010
Ferritin (ng/mL) HD group 93.2 ± 239.9 Reference Reference
OL-HDF group 201.3 ± 493.1 108.1 (-1.9, 218.1) 0.054 106.6 (-7.1, 220.2) 0.066
TSAT (%) HD group -2.2 ± 15.4 Reference Reference
OL-HDF group -4.2 ± 18.7 -2.1 (-7.6, 3.5) 0.467 3.4 (-3.2, 10.0) 0.309
ESA dose (IU/kg/wk)b HD group -115.7 ± 189.7 Reference Reference
OL-HDF group -170.5 ± 257.1 -54.8 (-126.1, 16.5) 0.131 -46.6 (-119.1, 25.9) 0.206

Data regarding changes in values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

CI, confidence interval; ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; HD, hemodialysis; HDF, hemodiafiltration; OL-HDF, online-HDF; TSAT, transferrin saturation.

aAdjusted for age, sex, etiology of end-stage renal disease, time on dialysis, single-pool Kt/V, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), use of ESA, and use of intravenous iron. bFor darbepoetin alfa and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, the dose per week was multiplied by 200 to convert the units from micrograms to international units (Ref. [14]).