Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 24;11:154. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00154

Table 3.

Unconditional logistic regression analysis of MetS/central obesity risks according to the tertiles of serum ZAG levels.

ZAG tertiles
Measurement Lowest OR (95% CI) Median OR (95% CI) Highest OR (95% CI)
ZAG in MetS vs. control group
Range (μg/mL) <7.60 ≥7.60–8.60 ≥8.60
MetS/controls 58/15 51/23 42/32
Univariate (R2 = 0.055) 2.946 (1.419–6.117) 1.689 (0.861-3.314) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.004 0.127
Model 1 (R2 = 0.089) 2.963 (1.413–6.211) 1.744 (0.879–3.461) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.004 0.112
Model 2 (R2 = 0.392) 4.217 (1.716–10.365) 1.815 (0.804–4.100) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.002 0.151
Model 3 (R2 = 0.552) 6.124 (1.992–18.830) 3.126 (1.076–9.086) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.002 0.036
ZAG in central obesity vs. control group
Range (μg/mL) <7.72 ≥7.72 to 8.72 ≥8.72
Central obesity/controls 33/18 25/27 26/25
Univariate (R2 = 0.028) 1.763 (0.796–3.902) 0.890 (0.411–1.928) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.162 0.768
Model 1 (R2 = 0.052) 1.826 (0.817–4.079) 0.930 (0.425–2.035) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.142 0.855
Model 2 (R2 = 0.187) 1.911 (0.806–4.533) 0.935 (0.402–2.171) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.142 0.875
Model 3 (R2 = 0.333) 2.178 (0.794–5.974) 1.099 (0.406–2.978) 1 (reference)
P-value 0.130 0.852

ZAG, zinc-a2-glycoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome. Multivariate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from unconditional logistic regression models were used in the analysis. Model 1: adjusted for age and gender. Model 2: adjusted for Model 1+ alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase, creatinine, uric acid, urea nitrogen. Model 3: adjusted for Model 2+ grip strength, smoking, drinking, birth place, current address, education level, manual labor, and exercise frequency. Bold font indicated P < 0.05.