Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD008285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008285

Leborgne 1995.

Methods RCT
1995‐2004
Participants 340 patients
Stage IB2 to IVB
Interventions Radiotherapy versus concomitant chemoradiotherapy (Cisplatin, 5‐FU)
Outcomes Survival, disease‐free survival, local and distant recurrence
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Data checks on IPD provided suggest adequate sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelope
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Trial was not blinded due to nature of treatment interventions
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk IPD provided for all outcomes except acute toxicity and late toxicity
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk N/A (IPD supplied for all outcomes except acute toxicity and late toxicity)
Other bias Low risk Data checks on IPD provided suggest study is free of follow‐up bias