Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2019 May 13;14(6):1183–1194. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00093

Table 1.

Top Scaffold Samples That Exhibited the Greatest Displacement of the Fluorescent Probe during Scaffold Screeninga

Scaffold Sample # Structure Percent (%) signal change
2408 graphic file with name nihms-1574536-t0002.jpg 55.7
2407 graphic file with name nihms-1574536-t0003.jpg 21.2
2353 graphic file with name nihms-1574536-t0004.jpg 19.5
2157 graphic file with name nihms-1574536-t0005.jpg 19.4
2354 graphic file with name nihms-1574536-t0006.jpg 16.3
a

Screening results for the mixture-based scaffold ranking library at concentrations of 25 μg mL−1. Scaffold samples were ranked by their average percent change in anisotropy signal relative to controls (free probe in solution = 100%; probe maximally bound to ERK2 = 0%), indicating displacement of the FITC-X-Lig-D probe from the DRS of ERK2. Data reported as the average of two replicate samples at a mixture dose of 25 μg mL−1. Variable functional groups (X1–5) on each scaffold structure indicate that mixtures of different moieties are present.