Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 24;11(4):885–899. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.018

Table 3.

Comparison of synthetic and natural polyesters production, processing, properties and application.

Synthetic polyesters Bacterial polyesters (PHA) Ref.
Production and processing Bio-production of LA and chemical synthesis of PLA, PLGA Completely biosynthesized 4, 96, 131
No possibility of in vivo production and functionalization In vivo functionalization; One-step production of active agent and carrier, no need to produce, purify and conjugate active agent 26, 54, 131
Use of harsh chemicals for production Production from renewable sources 4, 132
Difficulty to scale-up Similar to bioprocesses for PHA production; Certain difficulties to scale-up 132, 133
Production cost comparable with conventional plastics like PET High cost of production; at least twice that of PLA 4, 131
High risk due to flammable and toxic solvents Low risk level 132
Production completed within days Production duration 1-2 weeks 132
Endotoxin contamination less probable due to synthetic origin Endotoxins can be efficiently removed; Use of Gram+ strains allows endotoxin free production 20
Properties Lower number of copolymers that can be produced; Only d- and l-lactic acids (LA) More than 150 monomeric building blocks for polymer design 4, 131
Approved by FDA and European Medicine Agency as drug delivery system Not approved by FDA as drug delivery system 131, 133, 3
Low drug loading No limitations regarding drug loading 32, 131, 133
Protection of drug from degradation Protection of drug from degradation 133, 3, 134
Biodegradable, biocompatible, low cytotoxicity Biodegradable, biocompatible, low cytotoxicity 30, 32, 96, 3
Material properties poor, could be adjusted by regulating d- and l-LA ratios Good thermomechanical properties from brittle, flexible to elastic, fully controllable, easy processability 4, 30, 96, 135
Degradation rate can be controlled Degradation rate can be controlled 130, 3
Drug delivery kinetics can be controlled Drug delivery kinetics can be controlled 32, 130
Easy particle size control Size of in vitro produced particles might be controlled, in vivo production limits control over particle size 30, 32, 34, 134
Application Wind variety of biomedical applications Applicable to a range of diseases 26, 133
Lowering pH at the site of implantation that might lead to sterile sepsis No detected side effect of PHA degradation 130, 131
Best chance for clinical application due to FDA approval. Packaging, printing, coating, yet limited by Tg of 65-75 °C Almost all areas of conventional plastic industry, limited by current higher cost and availability 4, 20, 131, 134