Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;16:104. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02327-1

Table 4.

Pearson correlation between age and morphometric fat variables measured by DXA and abdominal CT relative to the ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous and visceral adipose thickness in 22 mixed-breed dogs

Trait VAT (mm) SAT (mm) TAT (mm) VAT/SAT
Age (yrs) 0.456* −0.003 0.393 0.535*
Weight (kg) 0.711** 0.568** 0.732** 0.293
BCS (1–9) 0.305 0.200 0.305 0.307
DXA total body fat mass (kg) 0.804** 0.660** 0.831** 0.334
DXA total body fat percentage (%) 0.034 −0.021 0.025 0.133
CT total abdominal fat mass (kg)a 0.783** 0.638** 0.809** 0.326
CT total abdominal fat percentage (%)b 0.396 0.323 0.409 0.293
CT relative abdominal fat percentage (%)c 0.586** 0.622** 0.635** 0.203
CT visceral fat mass (kg)a 0.832** 0.594** 0.842** 0.412
CT visceral fat percentage (%)b 0.485* 0.163 0.452* 0.515*
CT relative visceral fat percentage %c 0.739** 0.348 0.711** 0.598**
CT SQ fat mass (kg)a 0.734** 0.656** 0.770** 0.261
CT SQ fat percentage (%)b 0.278 0.417 0.327 0.079
CT relative SQ fat percentage %c 0.282 0.611** 0.371 −0.146
CT V/SQ 0.396 −0.195 0.301 0.644**

BCS body condition score, CT computed tomography, DXA Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, SAT subcutaneous adipose thickness, SQ abdominal subcutaneous, TAT total adipose thickness, V/SQ visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio, VAT visceral adipose thickness

Correlation coefficient values connected with * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01

a fat mass calculated from fat volume assuming fat density of 0.923 kg/L

b fat percentage calculated by regional fat mass relative to total body mass

c fat percentage calculated by regional fat mass relative to total body fat mass