Table 3.
1 Group |
2 Groups |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leaf |
Xylem |
All organs |
Leaf + xylem |
||||
Ranking | SV ± SD | Ranking | SV ± SD | Ranking | SV ± SD | Ranking | SV |
Eucons04 | 0.008 ± 0.010 | Eucons27 | 0.010 ± 0.010 | Eucons04 | 0.017 ± 0.007 | Eucons04 | 0.011 |
Eucons08 | 0.018 ± 0.009 | Eucons07 | 0.017 ± 0.010 | Eucons08 | 0.021 ± 0.007 | Eucons08 | 0.016 |
Eucons32 | 0.023 ± 0.010 | Eucons06 | 0.023 ± 0.010 | Eucons21 | 0.022 ± 0.008 | Eucons21 | 0.019 |
Eucons21 | 0.027 ± 0.011 | H2B | 0.024 ± 0.011 | RibL23A | 0.032 ± 0.009 | RibL23A | 0.020 |
RibL23A | 0.033 ± 0.012 | Eucons21 | 0.025 ± 0.011 | Eucons06 | 0.036 ± 0.009 | Eucons06 | 0.036 |
GAPDH | 0.035 ± 0.013 | RibL23A | 0.027 ± 0.011 | H2B | 0.037 ± 0.010 | H2B | 0.037 |
Eucons06 | 0.038 ± 0.014 | Eucons04 | 0.028 ± 0.012 | Eucons32 | 0.047 ± 0.011 | Eucons27 | 0.045 |
H2B | 0.045 ± 0.016 | Eucons08 | 0.029 ± 0.012 | GAPDH | 0.052 ± 0.012 | Eucons32 | 0.046 |
Eucons07 | 0.051 ± 0.017 | Euc12 | 0.036 ± 0.013 | Eucons27 | 0.052 ± 0.012 | GAPDH | 0.048 |
At2g28390 | 0.054 ± 0.018 | Eucons32 | 0.050 ± 0.017 | Eucons07 | 0.060 ± 0.014 | Eucons07 | 0.058 |
Eucons27 | 0.059 ± 0.020 | GAPDH | 0.056 ± 0.019 | At2g28390 | 0.073 ± 0.016 | Euc10 | 0.062 |
TUA2 | 0.059 ± 0.020 | At2g28390 | 0.058 ± 0.020 | Euc12 | 0.074 ± 0.016 | At2g28390 | 0.067 |
Euc12 | 0.069 ± 0.023 | TUA2 | 0.071 ± 0.023 | Eucons43 | 0.101 ± 0.022 | Euc12 | 0.068 |
Euc10 | 0.074 ± 0.024 | Eucons43 | 0.088 ± 0.029 | TUA2 | 0.103 ± 0.022 | Eucons43 | 0.083 |
Eucons43 | 0.086 ± 0.028 | Euc10 | 0.138 ± 0.044 | Euc10 | 0.106 ± 0.023 | TUA2 | 0.094 |
Best combination of two genes | Eucons04 Eucons08 | 0.009 |
Complementary DNAs from leaf and xylem (E. grandis, E. dunnii, E. pellita, E. saligna and E. urophylla), xylem (E. globulus) and flower (E. grandis) were subjected to RT–qPCR and results were analyzed with the NormFinder software in single groups of leaf or xylem, or all tissues/organs together. Results for the groups of leaf and xylem together are also presented. The best two reference genes for all the analyses performed are indicated at the bottom.