Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 12;3(4):1492–1501. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz116

Table 5.

Effects of weaning date1 and winter grazing2 treatment applied to dam on steer progeny growth, feedlot performance, and carcass characteristics

October December P-value
Item WR0 WR1 WR2 CR WR0 WR1 WR2 CR SEM Wean Winter W×W
Initial BW, kg 239cd 255ab 246bc 266a 225d 226d 245bc 241c 7 <0.01 <0.01 0.03
DMI3, kg/d 10.5 10.4 10.3 10.8 10.4 10.2 10.6 10.5 0.2 0.31 0.12 0.09
ADG, kg/d 1.72 1.68 1.73 1.76 1.70 1.71 1.78 1.79 0.05 0.37 0.07 0.81
G:F 0.164 0.161 0.169 0.163 0.164 0.168 0.168 0.171 0.004 0.07 0.33 0.27
HCW, kg 375bc 380abc 380abc 397a 364c 365c 386ab 385ab 11 0.09 0.01 0.38
LM area, cm2 89.0 89.6 90.6 92.3 87.8 87.3 91.0 89.5 2.0 0.19 0.21 0.76
FT4, cm 1.38ab 1.52ab 1.40ab 1.47ab 1.13c 1.34bc 1.38ab 1.55a 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.11
Marbling5 496 502 475 498 481 515 493 495 19 0.73 0.30 0.64
Yield grade6 2.88 3.00 2.82 2.91 2.65 2.77 2.79 3.07 0.29 0.35 0.25 0.31

1Weaning occurred in October or December.

2Winter nutritional treatments: range without supplement (WR0), winter range with 0.45 kg DM/d 32% CP supplement (WR1), winter range with 0.91 kg DM/d 32% CP supplement (WR2), corn residue without supplement (CR).

3Adjusted for BW in yr 1 and 2, actual in yr 3 and 4.

412th rib fat thickness.

5Marbling: Small00 = 400, Small50 = 450, Modest00 = 500.

6USDA yield grade.

abcdWithin a row, means lacking a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).