Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr;56(2):206–221. doi: 10.1080/10635150701294741

Table 3.

FN distance (× 10) for putative orthologs data set. Average FN distance (multiplied by 10) for each reference set of the putative orthologs data set. For word-based methods, we show the best performing word length k for each alphabet A. Methods are ordered according to their rank sums ∑R.

Reference set

No. graphic file with name 56-2-206-in1.jpg Method graphic file with name 56-2-206-in2.jpg k F-S F-L M-S M-L
1 15.5 d PB-SIM CE 0.607 0.272 0.735 0.866
2 16.5 d PB-ML CE 0.536 0.272 0.837 0.984
3 18.0 d S AA 3 0.473 0.167 0.937 1.252
4 22.0 d F AA 4 0.580 0.304 0.840 1.042
5 23.5 d PB-ML AA 0.533 0.272 0.754 1.337
6 27.5 d PB-SIM AA 0.650 0.385 0.712 1.053
7.5 37.0 d P AA 4 0.713 0.353 0.880 1.182
7.5 37.0 d F CE 6 0.657 0.256 1.022 1.337
9 38.5 d S CE 4 0.533 0.272 1.338 1.393
10 44.0 d LZ AA 0.763 0.423 0.897 1.074
11 45.5 B-bin AA 3 0.747 0.337 0.869 1.402
12.5 47.0 d E AA 4 0.697 0.449 0.998 1.259
12.5 47.0 d P CE 4 0.833 0.176 1.170 1.344
14 49.0 d E CE 6 0.800 0.353 0.991 1.328
15 49.5 d LZ CE 0.673 0.337 1.004 1.465
16 53.0 B-bin CE 4 0.840 0.224 1.139 1.619
17 55.5 d ACS AA 0.713 0.385 1.454 1.305
18 64.0 d ACS CE 0.973 0.321 1.453 1.437
19.5 75.0 d C AA 4 0.847 0.978 1.413 2.374
19.5 75.0 d C CE 4 0.807 1.346 1.832 2.183