Table 4.
Effects of dietary treatment and group size, and their interaction, on nursery pig growth performance, day 0–41
Treatment1 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Large group | Small group | P value | ||||||||||
Item, kg | NC | PC | ZA | DR | NC | PC | ZA | DR | SEM | Diet | Group size | Diet × group size |
Start BW | 6.12 | 6.11 | 6.11 | 6.12 | 6.09 | 6.09 | 6.09 | 6.08 | 0.089 | 0.997 | 0.013 | 0.958 |
End BW | 17.32 | 20.13 | 18.25 | 17.16 | 18.46 | 20.01 | 17.94 | 17.69 | 0.361 | <0.001 | 0.154 | 0.080 |
ADG | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.009 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.012 |
ADFI | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.011 | <0.001 | 0.144 | 0.015 |
G:F | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.203 |
1NC = negative control; PC = positive control: NC + dietary antibiotics; ZA = NC + ZnO + dietary acidifier; DR = NC + Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial + 5% resistant starch. Group size treatments: pigs were housed in groups of either 31 (large group) or 11 (small group) pigs per pen.