Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;207(11):1675–1683. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit081

Table 2.

Distribution of MBL2 Haplotypes in Cases and Controls

Haplotype Haplotypes, No. (%), by Study Group(s)
SEP vs SELN
SEP vs (SELP + SELN)
SEP (n = 326) SELP (n = 238) SELN (n = 128) SELP + SELN (n = 366) OR (95% CI) P a OR (95% CI) P a
MBL2* LXPA 41 (12.6) 23 (9.7) 21 (16.4) 44 (12) NS NS
MBL2* LYQC 93 (28.5) 77 (32.3) 31 (24.2) 108 (29.5) NS NS
MBL2* LYQA 93 (28.5) 70 (29.4) 37 (28.9) 107 (29.3) NS NS
MBL2* HYPA 15 (4.6) 19 (8) 13 (10.2) 32 (8.7) 0.4 (.18–1) .048 0.5 (.25–.98) .03
MBL2* LYPA 84 (25.8) 49 (20.6) 26 (20.3) 75 (20.5) NS NS
Low expression of MBL2*
 LYQC + LXPA 134 (41.1) 100 (42) 52 (40.6) 152 (41.5) NS NS
High expression of MBL2*
HYPA + LYQA + LYPA 192 (58.9) 138 (58) 76 (59.4) 214 (58.5) NS NS

Percentages may not sum to 100%, because of rounding errors. Study groups were as follows: the SEP group (cases) was composed of individuals who tested positive for Schistosoma eggs, the SELP group (controls) was composed of individuals who tested positive for Schistosoma antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the SELN group (controls) was composed of individuals who tested negative for Schistosoma antigens by ELISA and negative for Schistosoma eggs.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio.

a Adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.