Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 15;50(2):202–209. doi: 10.1086/648678

Table 2.

Bacterial Yield in the Study Population and the Contribution of Different Methods to the Determination of Etiology with Respect to Their Different Specificity

Pathogen No. (%) of patients with positive findings (n = 184) Blood culture (n = 179) Pleural fluid culture (n = 13) Urine antigen assaya BAL and/or protected specimen brush culture (n = 12) Culture and/or PCR from sputum sample for L. pneumophila (n = 138) Culture and PCR from respiratory sample for M. tuberculosis (n = 18) Sputum culture (n = 128) RQ-PCR from sputum sample (n = 126) Nasopharyngeal secretion culture (n = 158) PCR from nasopharyngeal secretion sampleb Serology (n = 131)
Streptococcus pneumoniae 70 (38) 27 16 10 10 7
Mycoplasma pneumoniae 15 (8) 8 7
Haemophilus influenzae 9 (5) 4 5
Moraxella catarrhalis 7 (4) 7
Staphylococcus aureus 4 (2) 2 1 1
Legionella pneumophila 3 (1) 2 1
Streptococcus pyogenes 2 (1) 1 1
Streptococcus milleri 1 (0.5) 1
Nocardia cyriacigeorgica 1 (0.5) 1
Fusobacterium necrophorum 1 (0.5) 1
Mycobacterium tuberculosis 2 (1) 2
Total 115 31 2 18 1 2 2 22 15 7 8 7

NOTE. Date are no. of patients who received a diagnosis by use of a particular method, unless otherwise indicated. Additional patients received a diagnosis by use of different methods; for example, an additional 16 cases of S. pneumoniae infection were diagnosed by a urinary antigen test that were not diagnosed by blood culture, and another 10 cases were diagnosed by sputum culture that were not diagnosed by blood culture or a urinary antigen test. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; RQ-PCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

a

There were 168 patients who tested positive for L. pneumophila and 169 patients who tested positive for S. pneumoniae.

b

The were 99 patients who tested positive for Chlamydophila pneumoniae and 101 patients who tested positive for Mycoplasma pneumoniae.