Table 1.
Detection of SARS CoV by conventional and real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays.
A. Conventional RT-PCR assay. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Days after onset | No. of samples | No. of positive samples in conventional RT-PCR | ||
NPA | ||||
1–3 | 39 | 10 | ||
4–6 | 78 | 32 | ||
7–10 | 53 | 32 | ||
Stool | ||||
1–3 | 8 | 2 | ||
4–6 | 17 | 10 | ||
7–10 | 19 | 13 |
B. Conventional and real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Days after onset | No. of samples | No. of positive samples | ||||
Conventional RT-PCR | Quantitative RT-PCR | |||||
NPA1 | ||||||
1–3 | 32 | 10 | 16 | |||
4–6 | 35 | 9 | 11 | |||
7–10 | 31 | 14 | 16 | |||
Stool | ||||||
1–3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | |||
4–6 | 15 | 10 | 12 | |||
7–10 | 16 | 10 | 10 |
The overall detection rate of the quantitative RT-PCR assay is statistically different from that of the conventional RT-PCR assay (McNemar test, P <0.01; 95% confidence interval, 4.2–16.2%).