Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 1;50(1):67–72. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.023663

Table 1.

Detection of SARS CoV by conventional and real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays.

A. Conventional RT-PCR assay.
Days after onset No. of samples No. of positive samples in conventional RT-PCR
NPA
 1–3 39 10
 4–6 78 32
 7–10 53 32
Stool
 1–3 8 2
 4–6 17 10
 7–10 19 13
B. Conventional and real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays.
Days after onset No. of samples No. of positive samples
Conventional RT-PCR Quantitative RT-PCR
NPA1
 1–3 32 10 16
 4–6 35 9 11
 7–10 31 14 16
Stool
 1–3 6 2 4
 4–6 15 10 12
 7–10 16 10 10
1

The overall detection rate of the quantitative RT-PCR assay is statistically different from that of the conventional RT-PCR assay (McNemar test, P <0.01; 95% confidence interval, 4.2–16.2%).