Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 15;14(5):252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.12.007

Table 2.

Reverse vaccinology/functional/structural genomics approaches: features and limitations

Approach Features Limitations
Reverse vaccinology
Classical Fast It cannot be used to develop vaccines on the basis of nonprotein-coding antigens, like lipopolysaccharides
Comprehensive: it can virtually identify all potential antigens in a pathogen's genome, irrespective of their abundance, phase of expression and immunogenicity It needs animal models, because there is a potential lack of method to measure in vitro efficacy
It could be used against all pathogens, including those that cannot be grown in vitro It lacks of information on gene expression
Pan-genomic
Very exhaustive It requires the sequences of multiple isolates
It performs interspecies and intraspecies comparisons It needs a crucial selection of very representative strains of a given microorganism
It could be useful to develop universal vaccines

Functional genomics
Transcriptomics Very comprehensive There is not a direct correlation between mRNA and protein expression level
It provides indications on semiquantitative data of genes expressed during infection It does not give information on protein localization and gene expression regulation at the transcriptional level
It can identify pathogenicity factors It requires a high number of bacteria
Proteomics
It provides qualitative and quantitative data on protein expression It could identify only a fraction of all proteins
It can identify membrane-associated proteins It requires a large number of bacteria cells

It is time-consuming and expensive
Structural genomics
It can provide insights into protein structure, create comparative models of the most similar proteins and assign a previously unknown molecular function to a protein, providing the opportunity to recognize homologies undetectable by sequence comparison It is practically limited to comparative modeling for evolutionarily related proteins, with consequent problems for accurate protein model in case of low sequence similarity (less than 30%)
It can provide a complete understanding of molecular interactions It needs the implementing of de novo protein structure prediction for unique folds determination in the case of sequences that are divergent from those already in the Protein Data Bank
It can help the rational design of target epitopes to be used as vaccine candidates and increase the understanding of immune recognition mechanisms Structural genomics efforts often study individual protein domains rather than whole protein or complexes