Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 16;38(3):210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.12.015

Table 2.

Performance characteristics of all three assays by virus type

Virus CC
R-mix™
DAT
No. of detected/TPa Sensitivity (95% CI) (%) NPVb (%) Mean TTDc No. of detected/TP Sensitivity (95% CI) (%) NPV (%) Mean TTD No. of detected/TP Sensitivity (95% CI) (%) NPV (%) Mean TTD
RSV 33/78 42 (32–53%) 91.5 8.0 57/78 73 (62–82%) 95.8 1.2 72/72d 100 (94–100%) 100 <1.0
Influenza A and B 27/36 75 (59–86%) 98.3 3.4 28/36 78 (62–89%) 98.5 1.1 15/23d 65 (45–81%) 98.5 <1.0
Adenovirus 31/31 100 (87–100%) 100 4.8 14/31 45 (29–62%) 96.9 1.4
Parainfluenza 1–3 20/23 87 (67–96%) 99.4 6.0 19/23 83 (62–94%) 99.2 1.2
Enterovirus/rhinovirus 23/23 100 (83–100%) n.d.e n.d.
CMV 11/11 100 (70–100%) n.d. n.d.
HSV 5/5 100 (51–100%) n.d. n.d.

True positives defined as positive results by any methodology (specificity and PPV = 100%).

a

True positives.

b

Negative predictive value.

c

Time to detection (days) = duration between completion of sample processing and issuance of test result.

d

Lower denominators for DAT compared to cultures reflect fewer samples tested by this methodology.

e

Not determined.