Table 1.
Call rate and correctness of the HCM1 resequencing array.
| Sample No. | Call rate, %1 | Correctness, %2 | Discordant calls, n3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heterozygote | Homozygote | ||||
| 1 | 96 (98) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 95 (98) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 95 (98) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 94 (97) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 94 (97) | >99.9 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6 | 94 (97) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | 96 (98) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | 96 (98) | >99.9 | 1 | 0 | |
| 9 | 96 (98) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10 | 95 (97) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
1
Percentage of resequenced bases that were unambiguously identified. The call rate for the coding portion (plus splice sites) of each array is given in parentheses.
2
The percentage of correctly called bases (as evaluated by ACS) with respect to the total number of bases called (excluding ambiguous calls).
3
Two heterozygous sites were overlooked, one by ACS and one by the HCM1 array.