Table 2.
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | 95% CI | b | 95% CI | b | 95% CI | |||||||
Drinking frequency | ||||||||||||
Female | −0.456 | −0.572 | −0.340 | *** | −0.458 | −0.574 | −0.342 | *** | −0.437 | −0.606 | −0.268 | *** |
In relationship | −0.090 | −0.198 | 0.018 | −0.087 | −0.195 | 0.021 | −0.069 | −0.224 | 0.086 | |||
GPS | 0.109 | 0.050 | 0.168 | *** | 0.169 | 0.085 | 0.253 | *** | 0.193 | 0.085 | 0.301 | ** |
In relationship × GPS | – | – | – | −0.105 | −0.211 | −0.001 | * | −0.158 | −0.307 | −0.009 | * | |
Female × GPS | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.061 | −0.230 | 0.108 | |||
Female × in relationship | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.038 | −0.254 | 0.178 | |||
Female × in | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.109 | −0.107 | 0.325 | |||
relationship × GPS | ||||||||||||
Pseudo-R2 | 0.073 | 0.076 | 0.077 | |||||||||
Intoxication frequency | ||||||||||||
Female | −0.543 | −0.657 | −0.429 | *** | −0.544 | −0.658 | −0.430 | *** | −0.535 | −0.700 | −0.370 | *** |
In relationship | −0.178 | −0.284 | −0.072 | ** | −0.176 | −0.282 | −0.070 | ** | −0.171 | −0.322 | −0.020 | * |
GPS | 0.111 | 0.054 | 0.168 | *** | 0.179 | 0.097 | 0.261 | *** | 0.239 | 0.133 | 0.345 | *** |
In relationship × GPS | – | – | – | −0.118 | −0.220 | −0.016 | * | −0.222 | −0.365 | −0.079 | ** | |
Female × GPS | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.149 | −0.314 | 0.016 | |||
Female × in relationship | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.016 | −0.226 | 0.194 | |||
Female × in | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.223 | 0.013 | 0.433 | * | ||
relationship × GPS | ||||||||||||
Pseudo-R2 | 0.110 | 0.114 | 0.117 | |||||||||
AD symptoms | ||||||||||||
Female | −0.197 | −0.317 | −0.077 | ** | −0.199 | −0.319 | −0.079 | ** | −0.123 | −0.297 | 0.051 | |
In relationship | −0.097 | −0.209 | 0.015 | −0.095 | −0.207 | 0.017 | −0.028 | −0.189 | 0.133 | |||
GPS | 0.123 | 0.064 | 0.182 | *** | 0.191 | 0.105 | 0.277 | *** | 0.196 | 0.084 | 0.308 | ** |
In relationship × GPS | – | – | – | −0.119 | −0.229 | −0.009 | * | −0.154 | −0.309 | 0.001 | ||
Female × GPS | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.018 | −0.192 | 0.156 | |||
Female × in relationship | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.134 | −0.359 | 0.091 | |||
Female × in | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.069 | −0.154 | 0.292 | |||
relationship × GPS | ||||||||||||
Pseudo-R2 | 0.029 | 0.032 | 0.034 |
Linear mixed models for each of the alcohol phenotypes. Each model includes age, educational attainment, and student status as covariates. Clustering at the family level modeled by including random intercepts. GPS and alcohol phenotypes were standardized for easier interpretation.
P < 0.05
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001. GPS = genome-wide polygenic scores.