Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 9;9:e50469. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50469

Figure 4. Slow versus fast learning: conditions for correct encoding of task-sets in the network model.

Figure 4.

(a) Difference in the performance of the network model with or without task-set inference, plotted as a function of the associative network learning rate α and the task-set network learning rate QP, (with β=7 and inference strength JINC=0.7). (b) Same difference in performance but plotted as a function of the inference strength JINC and the task-set network learning rate QP, (with β=7 and associative network learning rate α=0.4). We computed the performance averaged over the five first correct responses for a stimulus, in the last third of the session, on an average of 200 runs of the recurrent session and with 10% noisy trials. The dashed black lines mark the diagonal. The dashed yellow lines correspond to α=0.4 and JINC=0.7 respectively, and relate (a) to (b).