Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;130(4):1683–1698. doi: 10.1172/JCI131254

Figure 2. Impaired thymocyte development and peripheral T cell compartment in T-PRMT5Δ/Δ mice.

Figure 2

(A) Gating strategy for analysis of thymocyte populations and representative thymic Treg percentage plots. Live/dead gating was also performed after FSC/SSC but is not displayed. (BG) Thymocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry and (B) B220, (C) DN, (D) DP, (E) CD4 SP, (F) Treg, and (G) CD8 SP thymocyte numbers were calculated. (HN) Splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry (gating strategy in I and H) B220 splenocyte, (J) CD4+, (K) Treg, (L) CD8+, (M) CD4+ Tem, Tcm, and naive populations, and (N) CD8+ Tem, Tcm, and naive populations were calculated. (O) iNK T cell flow cytometric analysis gating strategy and total (P) thymic and (Q) splenic iNKT cell numbers. Data are representative of 4 independent experiments. Shown n = 4–5 independent mice of matched age. One-way ANOVA, followed by Sidak’s (BH and JN) or Tukey’s (P and Q) multiple-comparisons test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Bar graphs display mean ± SD. DN, double negative; DP, double positive; SP, single positive; Tem, effector memory T cells; Tcm, central memory T cells.